Tag Archive | "Fox News"

A Nation Absent Civility

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


On Saturday, January 8, 2011, as many of us on the East Coast were in the midst of weekend errands and events, reports from Arizona indicated that Gabrielle Giffords, Congresswoman from Arizona’s 8th congressional district had been assassinated during a political event outside a local grocery store.  Early reports proved false as the Congresswoman survived a shot to the head and remained in critical condition following surgery.  Nonetheless, at that event, 20 people were shot and 6 died of their wounds, including a 9-year old girl.


The gunman, identified by authorities as Jared Loughner, is a 22-year old who has been described as a social outcast and displayed prior behavioral problems as recently as September past when he was expelled from Pima Community College for causing disruptions in class and posting a bizarre YouTube video (see video below) in which he professes the College to be illegal under the U.S. Constitution.


Deeply distrustful of government and authority, Loughner apparently had been considering or planning the attack over the past number of weeks, purchasing a 9mm Glock handgun on November 30th, 2010 and posting a cryptic message foretelling the shootings on his MySpace page very early the morning of the assassination attempt.  Misguided and apparently deranged, Loughner fits the classic “loner” profile that has been the mark of so many individuals throughout recorded history who have perpetrated pernicious and deadly acts against their fellow men.


Yet, before we chalk up this tragedy to the actions of a sole lunatic, one must question in this instance whether the lack of civility in our political discourse and those who employ toxic rhetoric in branding legitimate political opposition as “extremism” bear some of the blame for the shootings.  We live in an age in which our nation has experienced sweeping change and political upheaval the likes of which have not been experienced since the Industrial Revolution.  Technology and the advent of the Information Age have increased the segmentation of American society and culture.  Today, individuals can view websites, read book and periodicals, and watch television programming that conforms strictly to their particular social, cultural, and political perspectives.


As Americans have become immersed in their own little worlds, they have become less tolerant of viewpoints different from their own.  Nowhere is this more evident than in the realm of political thought.  Unlike a half century ago, political discourse is dominated by extremes.  Liberals (or Progressives as some prefer to be classified) and Conservatives battle it out on virtually every major issue facing our country.  To win the support of a more moderate electorate at large, they demonize the positions held by their opponents.


Does any thinking person really believe that either George W. Bush or Barack Obama ascended to the Presidency with the intent of destroying the United States of America or our way of life?  Yet, if you place credence in the discourse of the extremes of the political spectrum, you would conclude that either or both might be guilty.  It has been said that “you are what you eat.”  Well, if you consume a steady diet of Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, and Fox News, it is likely that your worldview and political thinking will be radically different than those viewing Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and MSNBC.  And, for a disturbed individual, a firm belief in the extremism spouted by many in politics and the media may be just the impetus needed to motivate him to act – from a deluded sense of righteousness or patriotism.


Perhaps in the wake of this latest tragedy, we should all – regardless of our relative profiles or celebrity – commit to restoring civility to all forms of communication, for none of us has a monopoly on the truth.  Doing so would be the most meaningful tribute paid the deceased and those who will suffer permanent scars from this senseless shooting.


 

 

 

A National Disgrace

Tags: , , , , , ,


When Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder lost his life in Iraq on March 3, 2006, he set into motion a chain of events that leaves me wondering when the Constitution of the United States of America was shredded and discarded like so much junk mail.


Although Lance Corporal Snyder died in a non-combat related vehicle accident, he’d gone to Iraq to serve his country.  His inner call to duty came just months after he’d graduated high school in 2003.  Enlisting in the Marine Corps at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, Matthew was assigned, in August of 2004, to the Combat Logistics Battalion 7.  This battalion was deployed to Iraq, where Matthew met his death.


As Matthew’s body was en route back to his native Maryland, his grieving family planned, and indeed anticipated, a solemn ceremony commemorating his life and commending him to his Maker.  The family was denied this right when a Mr. Phelps and members of his Westboro Baptist Church burst into the proceedings with jeers and placards dishonoring the dead Marine.  The family was so shaken and righteously insulted that Matthew’s father, Al Snyder, filed a civil lawsuit against the offending parties; he had hoped that this action would prevent other military families from suffering in the same manner.


Al won the first round in court.  However, on an appeal, the judge reversed the decision, citing the defendant’s “right to free speech.”  To add further insult to injury, the dead soldier’s father was slapped with court fees of $16,000!  Refusing to have his son’s sacrifice desecrated, Al then brought the case before the Supreme Court, where it awaits a decision.


I learned of this deplorable case through journalist Bill O’Reilly of Fox News, who was so outraged that he offered to pay the $16,000 in honor of the fallen Marine.  I don’t know about you, but I am just as angered as Bill.  Something is seriously amiss in our society when we ask that men such as Mathew Snyder defend our country with their very lives while we, in return, refuse to defend them against unjustifiable affronts — and abuse the Constitution in so doing. 


Recently, President Obama surprised our troops in Afghanistan with an unannounced visit.   In a soul-stirring speech in which he vowed to pursue our enemies aggressively and win the war, Mr. Obama also gave his solemn promise that the troops’ families would be cared for while the soldiers themselves “finished the job.”   The part about caring for soldiers’ families seems mere rhetoric in light of the Snyder case now pending before the Supreme Court.  As Commander-in-Chief, I feel that our President’s voice should carry more than rhetoric.  It should defend Matthew Snyder as well as every other enlisted person that serves and protects our country.   Above all, it should question the interpretation of “the right to free speech” when that right is abused, as it so clearly was by Mr. Phelps and his cohorts at the Westboro Baptist Church.

Site Sponsors

Site Sponsors

Site Sponsors










RSSLoading Feed...

Live Traffic Feed

RSSLoading Feed...