On the Horns of a Dilemma

Posted on 14 November 2009

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

Friday the 13th arrived, living up to its reputation.  Yesterday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the man proudly calling himself the mastermind behind 9/11 will be tried not in a military trial, but in a civilian federal court in downtown Manhattan (New York City, for those of you not from the Big Apple).  Holder’s decision dovetails with President Obama’s plan to slam the doors on Gitmo, both literally and as an uncomfortable chapter in U.S. history that the President would rather have gone unwritten.

 

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is not the first Guantanamo Bay detainee to face trial in New York City rather than at the hands of the military; one of his cohorts, Ahmed Ghailani, claims that distinction.  However, the administration chose, at the time of Ghailani’s trial, not to seek the death penalty.  One wonders, then, what is to become of the man who alleges to have pitched his evil plan to Osama Bin Laden, negotiated funding from the rebel Afghani leader, trained the assassins, and then blessed the systematic extinction of more than 3,000 innocent American lives.

 

The ramifications of Holder’s decision are both widespread and complex, and if you are interested in those legalities, start surfing the web.  I am not an attorney or a politician.  I am but a New Yorker whose city has been irrevocably altered by a handful of madmen.

 

If Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is to attain a fair trial, as is his right under Constitutional Law, will he receive one?  The prosecution will have to journey to a mountain in Tibet to locate a single New Yorker yet to hear of and/or unaffected by the horror and tragedy of 9/11; New Yorkers, of course, do not live in Tibet.  But even if juror objectivity can be established, how can those jurors possibly be Mohammed’s peers, when his peers, by his own admission, are terrorists?

 

In the days shortly following 9/11, when the Bush administration linked Bin Laden to the fallen Towers and the 3,000-plus cold-blooded murders, I had thoughts of what I’d like to see happen to the terrorists.  At first, I thought it might be fitting to roast Bin Laden and his cronies over the still-smoking embers of Ground Zero; I meant this literally.  I added to this fantasy by envisioning the loved ones of those killed taking a pound of flesh, again literally, from the bastards.  One pound at time, strategically incised, would not kill them outright and would surely not kill them immediately.  They would have died a slow, torturous death. I thought this a fitting end for the filthy lot of them.  With the full knowledge that such fantasies might call bad karma to befall me, I maintained them nonetheless, struggling with my morals as a Christian and with my civic duty as a native New Yorker.

 

A part of me would still like to see Mohammed and his cohorts let loose into the streets of my city.  If the faint-hearted are afraid to venture there, imagine how the terrorists might feel, facing a righteously enraged mob unrestricted in addressing those who plotted for five years (according to Mohammed) to annihilate their loved ones. And some part of me would dearly love to see these proceedings televised.

 

The other part of me says that the dirty bastard deserves a fair trial, for that is the only way to preserve what the terrorists sought so hard to destroy and what they still seek to obliterate.   Our justice system only works if it works for all, terrorists or not.  To deny the self-proclaimed architect of 9/11 a fair trial is to negate the tenets underpinning our Constitution.  And the toppling of the Constitution was their ultimate objective, not merely the felling of two mighty skyscrapers and their occupants.

 

Having said that, I hope the bastards do get the death penalty once they are tried as fairly as we can manage within our system.  And I hope that the executions are televised, to send a small message to every other anti-American murderer, including terrorists-in-the-making.

 

In the words of Jesus Christ, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.  And render unto God what is God’s.”   The execution of Mohammed and his followers for their crimes of terrorism would kill both of those birds with a single stone.





This post was written by:

Kathleen Felleca - who has written 56 posts on Write On New Jersey.


Contact the author

34 Responses to “On the Horns of a Dilemma”

  1. Jordan says:

    Kathleen, I’m sure that many Americans, particularly those within shouting distance of New York City, feel the same way that you do. The greatest fear of others, however, is that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will attract the representation of some high-powered lawyer (probably on a pro bono basis) and that this trial will become a media circus. And, is it too far-fetched to believe that perhaps his lawyer will get him off ala OJ Simpson?

  2. Carmine says:

    One has to wonder about the motives of U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder”s decision to try prisoners of war in a civilian fedral court on American soil. Under the rules of war spelled out by the Geneva Convention should apply. Prisoners of war are interred in POW camps untill wars end, then a military tribunal would determine whether they should be returned to their homeland or stand trial for crimes committed.U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder had only to review the proceedings of how the Japanese were tried for the attack on Pearl Harbor on Decmber 7th 1941. Was his descision orchestrated by the White House?

  3. Sabrina Fies says:

    Hi my name is Sabrina and I was surfing online, then I found your blog, which I liked very much, which is quite pleasant to read. Return next week to read you again. Greetings Sabrina

  4. tactical body armor says:

    I am hoping for our Military men in Afghanistan are given the necessary tools to complete their mission. The House has to approve the funding needed to purchase the body armor and other supplies necessary to bring stability to the region.

  5. James says:

    Hey There! I have been searching the web in regards to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed for what seems like ages now. Its really nice to know that someone out there is really writing great blogs about it. How often do you write? Everyday? once a week? The Best way to contact me is by email. I check it everyday. Signed this day (Sunday).

  6. free death records says:

    Hi, I thought I would drop you a line and inform you that your page layout is really messed up on the Firefox browser. Seems to work OK on IE though. Anyhow keep up the great work.

  7. Rob Concini says:

    I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am launching a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business.

  8. South Park says:

    to be further series’ or is that it after this one finishes?

  9. Brianne Traycheff says:

    I like your writing style thanks for the info -cheers-

  10. calum nairn says:

    You made some Good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree.

  11. political satire songs says:

    Good post! I Googled around for this… I found your site! :) I have a Political Commentary site of my own. Anyway would you mind if I posted a return link from my blog site to your web site?

  12. Hipolito M. Wiseman says:

    Thanks for the nice post.

  13. Peter - Aged 65 says:

    I’m confused about this whole thing at moment. Need to read up on it big style!

  14. Lynna Mazzera says:

    Very nice post. Do you accept guest writers?

  15. Derek Angry says:

    Thank you for this article!

  16. Carroll B. Merriman says:

    Great Post. Thank you.

  17. Dorothea Seifer says:

    I like your writing style thanks for the info -cheers-

  18. Skillett says:

    Easily, this post is the greatest on this valuable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your next updates. Just saying thank you will not be sufficient, for the tremendous lucidity in your writing. I will immediately subscribe to your feed to stay abreast of any updates. Solid work and much success in your business enterprise!

  19. Wilmer Redford says:

    Very good blog post I love your site keep up the great posts

  20. Gregory Despain says:

    Wow! what an idea ! What a concept ! Beautiful .. Amazing �

  21. Fred says:

    Your blog really hit right on the top. wonderful work, I look forward to your next posting.

  22. hypnotize says:

    Thanks so much.

  23. Woot says:

    Great post! I’ll be sure to add a link to this article…

  24. James Brooks says:

    Very interesting article I enjoy your website carry on the great articles

  25. Orange County says:

    I love the post…

  26. Ramon Stadel says:

    I really like the fresh perpective you did on the issue. Really was not expecting that when I started off studying. Your concepts were easy to understand that I wondered why I never looked at it before. Glad to know that there’s an individual out there that definitely understands what she’s discussing. Great job

  27. Carrie Ercolani says:

    From a fellow blogger to another blogger i must say the articles you write are amazing I just hope i’ll get to this level soon .

  28. Frankie Stoklasa says:

    I just hate to ask for more, but still do, so more

  29. Lowell Fishbein says:

    Interesting.

  30. Allison Schallig says:

    Nice Nice.

  31. Nicky Wolgamot says:

    This gotta be the best site ever!


Leave a Reply

Site Sponsors

Site Sponsors









Site Sponsors

RSSLoading Feed...
RSSLoading Feed...